Long Lever Intelligence 360·Demonstration only: all companies, people and figures are fictionalNo real business data is used. Any resemblance to a real business is coincidental.

Back to Long Lever Partnerships

Long Lever Intelligence 360

Retro planner

A smarter retro than a flat scheme

Pay for growth you wouldn’t otherwise get. Each account gets a target built from the money it spends elsewhere, and the booster pays only on the families it buys from someone else today.

60 accounts · 29.19% of their wallet todayFictitious example · real build

The proposition

A smarter retro than a flat scheme: pay for growth you wouldn’t otherwise get. Personal targets instead of one rate for everybody, and a booster that pays only on the families an account buys elsewhere.

Accounts on the scheme

60

installers with headroom to win

Spend with all suppliers

£160.98m

estimated across the trade base

Long Lever Supply’s share today

29.19%

£46,987,667 of trade

Headroom left elsewhere

£113.99m

£30.27m now targeted

The recommendation

Written by the model over the calculated figures, at the recommended setting: base 2%, booster 3%, 30% of the headroom targeted.

The modelled scheme costs £1,015,075.35 against 60 accounts, targeting £34,198,583.45 of lift and returning £9,692,436.38 in extra sales, for an extra margin of £2,746,836.47 and a net gain of £1,731,761.12, or £2.71 per pound spent. Against the flat scheme's net gain of -£474,547.23 and return of £0.50 per pound, the difference is the headroom capture rate: 21% here versus 12% flat, which is what turns a loss into a gain.

Funding tiers overlap with target accounts

Brand G (CCTV) will miss its next tier at current run rate, with a gap of £11,528,422 and £220,100 extra rebate at stake, across accounts including Company O, Company P and Company F, all of whom appear in the top target list.

Headroom concentrated in few accounts and families

Of £113,994,281.06 total headroom, the top ten targets alone account for over £40m, with boost headroom concentrated in Sounders and beacons (£2,730,501.92) and Access hardware (£1,875,271.27).

Last quarter shows baseline leakage risk

Last quarter's measured scheme paid £241,581.14, of which £229,181.08 (94.87%) was paid on baseline trade, yielding a net gain of -£74,878 and a return of £0.69 per pound; this is inference that a flat-style capture overpays trade that would have arrived anyway.

Personal targets

Each account’s target is its current spend with Long Lever Supply plus a share of the headroom it buys elsewhere, rounded to the nearest £250. Edit any target to model your own.

AccountEngineersAll suppliersLong Lever Supply nowShareHeadroomTargetLiftBuys elsewhere
Company V

Midlands

182£7.66m£1.54m20.07%£6.12m
£
+£1.84m
Access hardwareDoor entryNetworking
Company F

Scotland

151£6.33m£1.63m25.79%£4.70m
£
+£1.41m
Brackets and mountsBatteries
Company AA

London & South East

148£6.22m£1.66m26.6%£4.57m
£
+£1.37mbuys across the range
Company AD

Wales

134£5.64m£1.26m22.27%£4.39m
£
+£1.32m
Batteries
Company U

Wales

137£5.76m£1.50m26.12%£4.25m
£
+£1.28mbuys across the range
Company AB

South West

125£5.24m£1.08m20.55%£4.16m
£
+£1.25m
Sounders and beaconsAccess hardwareDoor entry
Company L

Midlands

120£5.04m£1.32m26.27%£3.71m
£
+£1.11mbuys across the range
Company AI

North West

113£4.76m£1.20m25.1%£3.57m
£
+£1.07m
Power supplies
Company T

Midlands

113£4.76m£1.36m28.47%£3.41m
£
+£1.02mbuys across the range
Company Y

London & South East

116£4.88m£1.53m31.31%£3.35m
£
+£1.01m
Access hardwareDoor entryCabling
Company S

South West

112£4.71m£1.45m30.82%£3.26m
£
+£978k
Access hardwareDoor entry
Company AF

East of England

119£4.99m£1.79m35.86%£3.20m
£
+£960k
Cabling
Company O

London & South East

115£4.83m£1.81m37.51%£3.02m
£
+£906k
Brackets and mounts
Company AK

Midlands

87£3.67m£749k20.4%£2.92m
£
+£877k
Access hardwareDoor entryNetworking
Company I

Wales

100£4.21m£1.56m37.03%£2.65m
£
+£795kbuys across the range
Company E

Yorkshire & North East

88£3.68m£1.04m28.14%£2.65m
£
+£794k
Sounders and beaconsPower suppliesCabling
Company G

Yorkshire & North East

82£3.43m£804k23.43%£2.63m
£
+£788k
Access hardwareDoor entry
Company AH

Yorkshire & North East

90£3.77m£1.17m31.15%£2.59m
£
+£778k
Access hardwareDoor entryNetworking
Company P

London & South East

105£4.43m£1.84m41.58%£2.59m
£
+£776k
Access hardwareDoor entryNetworking
Company A

South West

79£3.30m£757k22.95%£2.54m
£
+£763k
Access hardwareDoor entry
Company AJ

London & South East

78£3.28m£745k22.75%£2.53m
£
+£759kbuys across the range
Company R

Midlands

90£3.78m£1.26m33.18%£2.53m
£
+£759k
Sounders and beaconsCablingBatteries
Company C

London & South East

83£3.49m£1.28m36.54%£2.22m
£
+£665k
Sounders and beacons
Company AG

South West

75£3.15m£1.05m33.51%£2.09m
£
+£628k
Sounders and beaconsCamerasRecorders
Company D

Scotland

75£3.16m£1.08m34.19%£2.08m
£
+£623k
Access hardwareDoor entryCabling
Company AE

Yorkshire & North East

68£2.87m£1.20m41.91%£1.67m
£
+£500k
Access hardwareDoor entry
Company AX

South West

51£2.16m£550k25.43%£1.61m
£
+£483k
Sounders and beaconsBatteries
Company AO

London & South East

53£2.22m£650k29.28%£1.57m
£
+£471k
Power supplies
Company Z

South West

52£2.20m£638k28.95%£1.56m
£
+£469k
Batteries
Company AC

London & South East

53£2.21m£889k40.2%£1.32m
£
+£397k
Power supplies
Company H

Yorkshire & North East

51£2.16m£850k39.38%£1.31m
£
+£393k
Sounders and beacons
Company AW

South West

43£1.80m£499k27.79%£1.30m
£
+£389k
Access hardwareDoor entryNetworking
Company Q

Midlands

51£2.12m£832k39.23%£1.29m
£
+£387k
Power supplies
Company N

North West

37£1.57m£342k21.72%£1.23m
£
+£370k
Batteries
Company W

Yorkshire & North East

47£1.96m£779k39.71%£1.18m
£
+£355k
Sounders and beaconsPower supplies
Company X

East of England

44£1.86m£693k37.36%£1.16m
£
+£349k
Brackets and mounts
Company M

East of England

33£1.37m£330k24.07%£1.04m
£
+£312k
Sounders and beaconsAccess hardwareDoor entry
Company AV

London & South East

34£1.42m£427k30.14%£990k
£
+£297k
Sounders and beaconsDetectorsPanels
Company J

East of England

35£1.48m£514k34.67%£968k
£
+£290k
Access hardwareDoor entryNetworking
Company AP

Yorkshire & North East

26£1.09m£133k12.16%£959k
£
+£288k
CamerasBrackets and mountsCabling

Targets shown at 30% of headroom. Total target lift £30,265,437 across 40 accounts.

What-if model

Move the sliders: the cost of the scheme, the trade it should win and the net gain all recalculate from the accounts above.

Scheme cost

£893,253

£835,511 on existing trade, £57,742 on growth

Expected extra sales

£8.28m

21% of the targeted headroom converts

Extra gross profit

£2.35m

at the trade base margin of 28.4%

Net gain

£1.46m

2.63 of gross profit per £1 paid

Flat scheme, 2% on all spend

£-423k

costs £835,511 to win £412k of gross profit

Net gain against the base retro percentage

Booster held at 3%, targets as set above. Current setting marked.

1%1.5%2%2.5%3%3.5%4%4.5%5%6%£0£450k£900k£1.35m£1.80m

Why it beats a flat scheme

A flat scheme pays the same rate on spend that would have arrived anyway: £835,511 of retro on £41,775,563 of existing trade, against £835,511 here. The rest of the money goes on the families the account buys elsewhere.

What makes the growth happen

Accounts convert 21% of the headroom they are targeted on, and 28% of the booster headroom, where the offer is specific to a family they already buy elsewhere.

Where the risk sits

Everything above the booster is paid on the baseline. If an account wins no new trade, the £835,511 is still paid, which is what the last quarter’s measured scheme is there to keep honest.

Category boosters

Extra retro percentage on the families an account buys elsewhere. Measured from the basket gaps, where spend sits under 60% of the median for an installer of the same size.

Sounders and beacons

£2.73m

headroom across 14 accounts

Buying £172k against a £95k peer median

Access hardware

£1.88m

headroom across 19 accounts

Buying £1k against a £39k peer median

Door entry

£1.20m

headroom across 19 accounts

Buying £879 against a £25k peer median

Cameras

£1.16m

headroom across 7 accounts

Buying £363k against a £99k peer median

Recorders

£454k

headroom across 4 accounts

Buying £185k against a £87k peer median

Detectors

£593k

headroom across 6 accounts

Buying £146k against a £49k peer median

Cabling

£259k

headroom across 10 accounts

Buying £27k against a £15k peer median

Networking

£236k

headroom across 7 accounts

Buying £11k against a £14k peer median

Funding the scheme

Growth in these categories also pushes Long Lever Supply towards its own supplier rebate tiers, so part of the retro is paid for by the tier it releases.

Brand G · CCTV

Will miss the next tier at this run rate · 58 days of the period left

£220,100

released by £11,528,422 more spend

Biggest buyers in categoryCompany OCompany PCompany F

3 retro targets are on this list: Company F, Company O, Company P. Growing their CCTV spend by £3.09m serves both schemes at once.

Brand A · CCTV

On track for the next tier · 44 days of the period left

£144,200

released by £3,740,410 more spend

Biggest buyers in categoryCompany OCompany PCompany F

3 retro targets are on this list: Company F, Company O, Company P. Growing their CCTV spend by £3.09m serves both schemes at once.

Brand H · Fire

Will miss the next tier at this run rate · 38 days of the period left

£62,900

released by £2,404,400 more spend

Biggest buyers in categoryCompany PCompany YCompany I

3 retro targets are on this list: Company Y, Company I, Company P. Growing their Fire spend by £2.58m serves both schemes at once.

Brand D · Intruder

At risk of missing the next tier · 54 days of the period left

£54,600

released by £2,092,252 more spend

Biggest buyers in categoryCompany PCompany AACompany S

3 retro targets are on this list: Company AA, Company S, Company P. Growing their Intruder spend by £3.12m serves both schemes at once.

Brand B · Fire

On track for the next tier · 56 days of the period left

£48,900

released by £1,270,268 more spend

Biggest buyers in categoryCompany PCompany YCompany I

3 retro targets are on this list: Company Y, Company I, Company P. Growing their Fire spend by £2.58m serves both schemes at once.

Did it work last time?

The same scheme run last quarter, measured account by account: those that changed their behaviour against those that did not.

Accounts on the scheme

58

last quarter

Trade in the quarter

£11.50m

against £11.84m before

Extra trade attributable

£590k

-2.85% above their own baseline

Retro paid

£241,581

at 2.1% of the quarter's trade

Retro paid on the baseline

£229,181

94.87% of all retro, on spend that would have happened anyway

Net gain

£-75k

0.69 of gross profit per £1 of retro

Changed their behaviour

18 accounts · +13.89%

£545,986 of trade above their own baseline, on £4.48m of spend. Each of these accounts earned its target rather than collecting the rate.

No change

40 accounts · -11.17%

£147,566 of retro paid here produced no extra trade. The next quarter’s targets for these accounts are set from what they actually did, not from the rate card.

Account that moved mostEngineersBaselineQuarterChange
Company LMidlands120£339k£449k+32.48%
Company EYorkshire & North East88£224k£298k+33.3%
Company DScotland75£234k£294k+25.24%
Company FScotland151£418k£457k+9.25%
Company AFEast of England119£429k£465k+8.29%
Company GYorkshire & North East82£191k£225k+17.28%

Estimated spend covers everything an installer of that size buys, reconciled to their trade with Long Lever Supply, so Long Lever Supply's share of the wallet and the headroom left with other suppliers always add up. Booster families are the basket gap records, where spend is under 60% of the median for installers of the same size. The last-quarter figures are measured from the monthly records against each account's own three months before. £113,994,281 of headroom is identified across 60 accounts.

Long Lever Intelligence 360 · Fictitious example, real build. A demonstration of a platform we’ve built, shown with entirely fictional sample data under the Long Lever name. Every company, person, brand and figure is invented: customers are shown as Company A, Company B and so on, and no real business’s details have been used. No live data is read from any ERP, trade website or integration layer.